Expert advice, troubleshooting guides, and maintenance tips for all your appliances
5,493 articles
Or call (415) 795-7300
GE and Samsung ovens compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 960 GE filings against 661 Samsung ones. Samsung's reports concentrate on the control board at 13%; GE's spread across the heat path, and its igniter row is 3 points higher.
GE and Samsung refrigerators set against their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 265 GE filings against 1,556 Samsung ones. Both records are led by the ice maker, at 46% and 24%, and both are the most single-component records in this set.
GE and Whirlpool refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 265 GE filings against 170 Whirlpool ones. Whirlpool's record names three components with weight; GE's names one, and the rows where they match are the rows nobody names.
Kenmore and KitchenAid refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports — 373 Kenmore filings, 2011-2025, against 46 KitchenAid ones, 2011-2026. Seven of the eight compared rows lean the same way, and the eighth, the control board, lands on 7% in both.
Kenmore and LG refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports — 373 Kenmore filings, 2011-2025, against 192 LG ones, 2011-2026. Four of the eight compared rows show no difference at all, and the two records trade the other four between them.
Kenmore and Maytag refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports — 373 Kenmore filings, 2011-2025, against 76 Maytag ones, 2011-2026. Both records rank the compressor first and the ice maker second; the Maytag one simply puts far more of itself into those two rows.
Kenmore and Samsung refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports — 373 Kenmore filings, 2011-2025, against 1,556 Samsung ones, 2011-2026. The ice maker gap is 37 points, the widest here, and it is one of the few wide gaps measured well on both sides.
Kenmore and Whirlpool refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports — 373 Kenmore filings, 2011-2025, against 170 Whirlpool ones, 2011-2026. Three gaps run Whirlpool's way and one runs Kenmore's, which is what stops the page collapsing into a single explanation.
KitchenAid and LG ovens compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 405 KitchenAid filings against 719 LG ones. Two of the five compared rows match exactly at 2%, and the only real separation is at the top of each column.
KitchenAid and LG refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 46 KitchenAid filings against 192 LG ones. The two records rank their components differently while agreeing on the ice maker and landing on 7% for the control board in both.
KitchenAid and Maytag refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 46 KitchenAid filings against 76 Maytag ones. Both records put the compressor first, within 3 points of each other, and neither is large enough to settle anything below that.
KitchenAid and Samsung ovens compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 405 KitchenAid filings against 661 Samsung ones. Both records concentrate on the control board more than any other oven pairing here, at 8% and 13%, and agree on almost everything else.
KitchenAid and Samsung refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 46 KitchenAid filings against 1,556 Samsung ones. The two widest gaps on the page point in opposite directions, and one column carries thirty-four times the evidence of the other.
KitchenAid and Whirlpool ovens compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 405 KitchenAid filings against 635 Whirlpool ones. One record is a spike on the control board; the other is an even descent through the heat path.
KitchenAid and Whirlpool refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 46 KitchenAid filings against 170 Whirlpool ones. The same two components lead both records in opposite order, and that swap is most of what separates them.
LG and Maytag refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 192 LG filings against 76 Maytag ones. Maytag's second-place row is larger than LG's first, and the control board and the water valve are what LG has instead.
LG and Samsung ovens compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 719 LG filings against 661 Samsung ones. Two records of nearly the same size, with one substantial difference between them and nothing else above a single point.
LG and Whirlpool ovens compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 719 LG filings against 635 Whirlpool ones. Whirlpool's record leans towards the heat path, LG's towards the sensor, and the widest gap between them is 3 points.
LG and Whirlpool refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 192 LG filings against 170 Whirlpool ones. Two records of almost the same size that disagree more than any other evenly matched pair here.
Maytag and Samsung refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 76 Maytag filings against 1,556 Samsung ones. The ice maker is a top-two row in both records; the compressor is what puts them in different orders.
Maytag and Whirlpool refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 76 Maytag filings against 170 Whirlpool ones. The same two components dominate both records; only their order and the size of the wiring row separate them.
Samsung and Whirlpool ovens compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 661 Samsung filings against 635 Whirlpool ones. Two records of almost identical size, one 7-point difference at the top, and exact agreement on two rows.
Samsung and Whirlpool refrigerators compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports, 2011-2026 — 1,556 Samsung filings against 170 Whirlpool ones. Both records are led by the ice maker, at 46% and 34%, and the compressor is what separates them.
Electrolux and Frigidaire washers compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports — 39 Electrolux filings from 2014-2026 against 46 Frigidaire ones from 2011-2023. The Electrolux set is top-heavy (control board 21%, wiring 18%); the Frigidaire set is flat, with nothing above 9%.
Electrolux and GE washers compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports: 39 Electrolux filings from 2014-2026 against 181 GE ones from 2011-2026. The control board leads both corpora, and the motor is the one component GE's reports name more often — 7% against 3%.
Electrolux and Kenmore washers compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports: 39 Electrolux filings from 2014-2026 against 208 Kenmore ones from 2011-2026. Both corpora are led by the control board, and the widest gaps rest on near-identical report counts read against very different denominators.
Electrolux and LG washers compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports: 39 Electrolux filings from 2014-2026 against 295 LG ones from 2011-2026. LG's reports spread across eleven components with nothing above 5%; Electrolux's concentrate in three.
Electrolux and Maytag washers compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports: 39 Electrolux filings from 2014-2026 against 104 Maytag ones from 2011-2026. The control board is named in 8 reports on each side — identical counts printing as 21% and 8%.
Electrolux and Samsung washers compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports: 39 Electrolux filings from 2014-2026 against 540 Samsung ones from 2011-2026. Samsung is the one washer corpus not led by the control board — the drain pump or hose tops it at 4%, on 22 reports.
Electrolux and Whirlpool washers compared on their CPSC SaferProducts incident reports: 39 Electrolux filings from 2014-2026 against 115 Whirlpool ones from 2011-2026. The two lists run in the same order — control board, then wiring — and no component separates them by more than 10 points.
Let our professional technicians help. Same-day service available.